McDonald’s Restaurants: Illegal Advertising Directed at Children Under Thirteen Years of Age

Every consumer, pursuant to the terms of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act, who since November 15th, 2013, purchased a toy from McDonald’s (including McDonald’s franchised and company-operated restaurant sites), either with or without a Happy Meal®, for any child under thirteen years of age;

By | 2017-11-18T18:36:18+00:00 November 16th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on McDonald’s Restaurants: Illegal Advertising Directed at Children Under Thirteen Years of Age

Group RESP (Registered Education Savings Plan) Unlawful Enrollment Fees and Sales Charges – Quebec Consumer Class Action

All natural persons, who at any time since July 19th, 2013 (the “Class Period”), while residing in the province of Quebec, had a contract with any of the Defendants in which they were a subscriber and/or contributor (either primary or joint) for a Registered Education Savings Plan (“RESP”), and who were charged a fee (referred to as “Enrolment Fee”, “Sales Charge” and/or “Membership Fee”), including the commissions of the distributor and its salesmen, exceeding $200.00 per plan;

By | 2017-11-18T18:37:20+00:00 October 7th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on Group RESP (Registered Education Savings Plan) Unlawful Enrollment Fees and Sales Charges – Quebec Consumer Class Action

Free Trial Periods and Limited Time Discount Offers – Quebec Consumer Class Action

Every consumer, pursuant to the terms of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), who since July 4th, 2013 (the “Class Period”), was provided services or goods at a reduced price (the “Reduced Price”), for a fixed period (the “Fixed Period”), by any of the Defendants, and who, after the Fixed Period, was required to send a notice to any of the Defendants indicating that he/she does not wish to obtain the services or goods at the regular price (the “Regular Price”);

By | 2017-11-18T18:37:55+00:00 October 7th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on Free Trial Periods and Limited Time Discount Offers – Quebec Consumer Class Action

Société des Casinos du Québec: Charging a Higher Price than that Advertised on its Menus – Quebec Consumer Class Action

Every consumer, pursuant to the terms of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act (the “CPA”), who, since August 12th, 2013 (the “Class Period”), purchased any food or beverages from the Casino de Montréal, the Casino de Charlevoix, the Casino de Mont-Tremblant and/or of the Casino du Lac-Leamy, and who was charged a higher price than that advertised on the menu; or any other class to be determined by the Court. (hereinafter referred to as the “Class”);

By | 2017-11-18T18:38:16+00:00 October 7th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on Société des Casinos du Québec: Charging a Higher Price than that Advertised on its Menus – Quebec Consumer Class Action

IKEA Defective and Dangerous Chests of Drawers – Canada Consumer Class Action

All consumers within the meaning of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act (hereinafter the “CPA”), who any time before June 28th, 2016 (the “Class Period”), purchased any of the Chest of Drawers recalled by IKEA Canada, including but not limited to the following models: ASKVOLL, BRIMNES, BRUSALI, BUSUNGE, HEMNES, HURDAL, IKEA PS 2012, KOPPANG, KULLEN, MALM, NORNÄS, STOCKHOLM, STUVA, SUNDVIK, TARVA, TROGEN, TRYSIL, TYSSEDAL, UNDREDAL, Alesund, Alleby, Alvesta, Aneboda, Angus, Ånes, Arup, Askedal, Aspelund, Balstar, Bankeryd, Bergsmo, Bialitt, Birkeland, Blimp, Boj, Brett, Boksta, BJÖRN, BÖRKVALLA, Diktad, Edland, Elis, Engan, Eksil, Fjell, Fjord, Flaten, Fridolin, Granås, Gute, Haddal, Hajdeby, Hensvik, Herrestad, Holleby, Hovdal, Hopen, Hosteland, Kabin, Kirkenes, Knot, Kusk, Kurs, Kviby, Leksvik, Lo, Lomen, Mac, Mast, Mammut, Mandal, Meråker, Midsund, Natura, Narvik, Nordli, Nordnes, Nyvoll, Ottenby, Rakke, Ramberg, Ranvik, Rodd, Robin, Rustik, Sala, Skarnes, Sandefjord, Stranda, Sveio, Stavanger, Tassa, Tovik, Trandum, Trondheim, Varde, Vajer, Vallvik, Vestby,Vinstra, Visdalen, Vollen (hereinafter the “Defective Chests”);

By | 2017-11-18T18:38:37+00:00 October 7th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on IKEA Defective and Dangerous Chests of Drawers – Canada Consumer Class Action

Nissan Canada: Defective and Dangerous Nissan Versa (2007-2012) – Canada Class Action

All natural persons, legal persons established for a private interest, partnerships and associations or other groups not endowed with juridical personality, resident in Canada (subsidiarily Quebec), who, any time between May 8th, 2006 to November 30th, 2015 (the “Class Period”), purchased and/or leased one or more of the Nissan Versa Model Years 2007-2012 (the “Defective Vehicles”) manufactured, distributed, supplied, wholesaled and/or imported by Nissan;

By | 2017-11-18T18:39:10+00:00 October 5th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on Nissan Canada: Defective and Dangerous Nissan Versa (2007-2012) – Canada Class Action

Sears Canada: Repeat Pricing Errors – Canada Consumer Class Action

All persons in Canada (subsidiarily Quebec) who, since October 13th, 2012, ordered or purchased any goods or services from the Respondent by internet, by phone, by catalogue, and/or in-store (hereinafter the “Purchase”), and who, after receiving a confirmation of their Purchase from Sears at the price which it initially advertised, subsequently had their Purchase cancelled by the Sears, who did not respect the price it initially advertised.

By | 2017-11-18T18:39:53+00:00 October 5th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on Sears Canada: Repeat Pricing Errors – Canada Consumer Class Action

StubHub, Ticketmaster and other Ticket Resellers: Illegally Selling above Face Value and Charging a Higher Price than Advertised – Canada Class Action

Every consumer, pursuant to the terms of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), residing in Quebec at the time of purchase, who since August 28th, 2012 (the “Class Period”), while physically located in Quebec, has purchased from any of the Respondents at least one “Ticket” (as defined in section 236.1 CPA as meaning any document or instrument that upon presentation gives the ticket holder a right of entry to a show, sporting event, cultural event, exhibition or any other kind of entertainment) either: (a) at a price above that announced by the vendor authorized to sell the Tickets by the producer of the event; and/or, (b) who paid a price higher than the price advertised by Respondents on their respective websites and/or mobile applications (at the first step), excluding the Quebec sales tax or the Goods and Services Tax; or any other group to be determined by the Court;

By | 2017-11-10T13:55:52+00:00 October 5th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on StubHub, Ticketmaster and other Ticket Resellers: Illegally Selling above Face Value and Charging a Higher Price than Advertised – Canada Class Action

Bell Canada: False Representations about Bell Fibe™ connecting Fibre Optics to the Home – Quebec Class Action

All consumers within the meaning of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act, residing in Quebec, who subscribed to “FIBE TV” and/or “FIBE Internet” offered by Bell Canada between May 1st, 2012 and March 30th, 2017, and who were not connected to a 100% fibre optics network, or, who were not connected to a network entirely composed of fibre optics.

By | 2017-11-10T13:54:56+00:00 September 28th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on Bell Canada: False Representations about Bell Fibe™ connecting Fibre Optics to the Home – Quebec Class Action
Inline
LPC Avocat Inc.
Inline
LPC Avocat Inc.