About joeyadmin

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far joeyadmin has created 34 blog entries.

Société des Casinos du Québec: Charging a Higher Price than that Advertised on its Menus – Quebec Consumer Class Action

Case name Montreal Casino Alcoholic Beverages Quebec Class Action; Quebec Superior Court file # 500-06-000805-164; Violations Plaintiff alleges that the Société des Casinos du Québec violate paragraph c of section 224 of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act, by charging consumers a higher price than advertised for the drinks sold at the Casinos’ bars. Defendants [...]

By | 2017-01-31T09:05:23+00:00 October 7th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on Société des Casinos du Québec: Charging a Higher Price than that Advertised on its Menus – Quebec Consumer Class Action

IKEA Defective and Dangerous Chests of Drawers – Canada Consumer Class Action

Case name IKEA defective and dangerous chests class action; Quebec Superior Court file # 500-06-000797-163; Violations Plaintiff alleges that IKEA violated section 228 of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act, by failing to inform consumers of the serious dangers associated to the Chest of Drawers sold in mass by IKEA, including 3 deaths in the [...]

By | 2017-01-31T09:05:35+00:00 October 7th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on IKEA Defective and Dangerous Chests of Drawers – Canada Consumer Class Action

Nissan Canada: Defective and Dangerous Nissan Versa (2007-2012) – Canada Class Action

Case name ;Defective Nissan Versa 2007-2012 Class Action; Quebec Superior Court file # 500-06-000796-165; Violations Plaintiff alleges that Nissan violated section 228 of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act, by failing to inform consumers of the defects in the spring coils in Nissan Versa 2007-2012 models. Plaintiff further alleges that Nissan was negligent before, during and [...]

By | 2017-01-31T09:05:45+00:00 October 5th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on Nissan Canada: Defective and Dangerous Nissan Versa (2007-2012) – Canada Class Action

Red Bull Energy Drinks False Representations – Canada Consumer Class Action

Case name Red Bull Energy Drinks False Representations Class Action; Quebec Superior Court file # 500-06-000780-169; Violations Plaintiff alleges that Red Bull violated section 228 of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act, by failing to inform consumers of the inherent dangers concerning the ingestion of its Caffeinated Energy Drinks. Plaintiff further alleges that [...]

By | 2017-07-23T14:40:56+00:00 October 5th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on Red Bull Energy Drinks False Representations – Canada Consumer Class Action

Sears Canada: Repeat Pricing Errors – Canada Consumer Class Action

Case name Sears Canada Repeat Pricing Errors Class Action; Quebec Superior Court file # 500-06-000769-154; Violations Plaintiff alleges that Sears Canada repeatedly violates paragraph c of section 224 of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act, by charging a higher price than that advertised for their products. Plaintiff further alleges that Sears Canada fails to fulfill [...]

By | 2017-01-31T09:06:04+00:00 October 5th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on Sears Canada: Repeat Pricing Errors – Canada Consumer Class Action

StubHub, Ticketmaster and other Ticket Resellers: Illegally Selling above Face Value and Charging a Higher Price than Advertised – Canada Class Action

Case name StubHub and Ticketmaster Hidden Fees and Illegal Pricing Class Action; Quebec Superior Court file # 500-06-000754-156; Violations Plaintiff alleges that Defendants unlawfully sell tickets to consumers above face value, in violation of section 236.1 of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act. Plaintiff further alleges that Defendants violate paragraph c of section 224 of [...]

By | 2017-05-09T10:52:10+00:00 October 5th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on StubHub, Ticketmaster and other Ticket Resellers: Illegally Selling above Face Value and Charging a Higher Price than Advertised – Canada Class Action

Bell Canada: False Representations about Bell Fibe™ connecting Fibre Optics to the Home – Quebec Class Action

Case name Bell "Fibe" False and Misleading Publicity Class Action; Quebec Superior Court file # 500-06-000740-155; Violations Plaintiff alleges that Bell Canada misleads consumers by using the term Fibe and/or fibre optics when offering services that are in fact hybrid, composed of fibre optics and copper, in violation of section 219 of Quebec’s [...]

By | 2017-08-15T16:34:15+00:00 September 28th, 2016|Active Class Actions|Comments Off on Bell Canada: False Representations about Bell Fibe™ connecting Fibre Optics to the Home – Quebec Class Action